Code Yarns ‍👨‍💻
Tech BlogPersonal Blog

C++: POD

📅 2006-Jun-13 ⬩ ✍️ Ashwin Nanjappa ⬩ 📚 Archive

When programming in C++, mixing up C++ and C data types becomes an ugly inevitability. It always throws up some quirky behaviour. POD (Plain Old Data) is one of these I discovered today. C macros can be used unchanged under C++. But, the correct behaviour under C++ depends on the type of data being operated on. It needs to be of POD type.

Here is some information about the POD type from the excellent C++ FAQ Lite:

[26.7] What is a "POD type"? A type that consists of nothing but Plain Old Data. A POD type is a C++ type that has an equivalent in C, and that uses the same rules as C uses for initialization, copying, layout, and addressing. As an example, the C declaration struct Fred x; does not initialize the members of the Fred variable x. To make this same behaviour happen in C++, Fred would need to not have any constructors. Similarly to make the C++ version of copying the same as the C version, the C++ Fred must not have overloaded the assignment operator. To make sure the other rules match, the C++ version must not have virtual functions, base classes, non-static members that are private or protected, or a destructor. It can, however, have static data members, static member functions, and non-static non-virtual member functions. The actual definition of a POD type is recursive and gets a little gnarly. Here's a slightly simplified definition of POD: a POD type's non-static data members must be public and can be of any of these types: bool, any numeric type including the various char variants, any enumeration type, any data-pointer type (that is, any type convertible to void*), any pointer-to-function type, or any POD type, including arrays of any of these. Note: data-pointers and pointers-to-function are okay, but pointers-to-member are not. Also note that references are not allowed. In addition, a POD type can't have constructors, virtual functions, base classes, or an overloaded assignment operator.